Supreme Court decision · Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises
PAFLU v. Tabigne
Adm. Case No. 102 · Promulgated November 18, 1967 · Ponente: Dizon
In brief
This case is about an urgent motion for an additional period to file a memorandum in an administrative case filed by PAFLU against Judge Tabigne, which the Court referred to the investigator, Justice Mojica.
Administrative Case, Motion for Extension, Labor Union, Referral to Investigator
Related cases
- A.C. No. 736 Go v. Candoy (Previous decision in Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises)
- A.C. No. 546 Flores v. Lozada (Next decision in Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises)
Full text
[ Adm. Case No. 102. November 18, 1967 ]
PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (PAFLU), COMPLAINANT,
VS. HONORABLE EMILIANO C. TABIGNE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
R E S O L U T I O N
DIZON, J.:
Before Us is an urgent motion filed by
respondent praying for an additional period of five (5) days from
This administrative case having been referred for investigation to Mr. Justice Mojica of the Court of Appeals, let the motion abovementioned be referred to him for action.
Henceforth and until after the Investigator has submitted his report to this Court, all similar applications and/or motions, after being filed, shall be forwarded to him for the same purpose.
Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Bengzon, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles, and Fernando, JJ., concur.