Supreme Court decision · Administrative Law
Pascual v. Mariñas
A.M. No. P-1041 · Promulgated August 26, 1977 · Ponente: Fernandez
In brief
This case is about a deputy sheriff who was suspended for one month for unlawfully delegating the execution of a judgment to a sheriff guard.
Unlawful Delegation, Neglect of Duty, Sheriff Misconduct, Suspension, Execution of Judgment
Related cases
- G.R. No. L-44622 Baldoz v. Office of the President (Previous decision in Administrative Law)
- G.R. No. L-45414 Mayor of Dumaguete City v. Boncaros (Next decision in Administrative Law)
Full text
FIRST DIVISION
[ A.M. No. P-1041. August 26, 1977 ]
ELVIGIO PASCUAL, COMPLAINANT, VS. ANTONIO
MARINAS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
R E S O L U T I O N
FERNANDEZ, J.:
In a sworn letter-complaint dated
Mariñas and Paulino were required to appear for investigation before the DPI-PIAU, Malacañang. Mariñas allegedly sent for the complainant and told him to testify that Mariñas was present during the execution of the judgment.[1]
In his answer to the complaint, respondent Antonio Mariñas
alleged that complainant Elvigio Pascual
had been extended full courtesies by the Office of the Provincial Sheriff of
Rizal when he sought its assistance and help; that he has no knowledge of the sum
of P300.00 allegedly collected from the complainant; that he was not privy to
the alleged exaction made by Paulino on complainant for another sum of P4.40;
that as regards the electric stove, the same was not levied upon but it was the
subject of a contract of pledge executed by the defendant Eliseo Gaviola in
favor of the complainant; and that the judgment debtors in the ejectment case
vacated the leased premises and possession of the same was restored to the
herein complainant.[2]
The complaint against
Sheriff Guard Efren Pascual was not endorsed to him because according to the
Clerk of Court of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, 7th Judicial District,
that person is not a regular employee of the court.
In his answer, the respondent does not deny the principal charge that there was an unlawful delegation of respondent's duty to execute the judgment of the Municipal Court of Mandaluyong, Rizal, in Civil Case No. 5643 to Sheriff Guard Efren Paulino. In view thereof, there is no need to conduct an investigation of the case. The respondent is guilty of failure to comply with his duty to personally execute the decision in Civil Case No. 5643 of the Municipal Court of Mandaluyong.
WHEREFORE, respondent Antonio Mariñas, Deputy Sheriff of
[1]
Sworn letter-complaint of Elvigio Pascual, dated
[2]
Answer to complaint dated