Supreme Court decision · Administrative Law
Perol v. Lupisan
A.M. No. P-1487 · Promulgated December 20, 1977 · Ponente: Aquino
In brief
This case is about an administrative complaint charging a municipal court interpreter with immorality, which was dismissed after the complainant withdrew and respondent's appointment expired.
Immorality, Administrative Complaint, Court Interpreter, Complaint Withdrawal, Expired Appointment
Related cases
- G.R. No. L-28021 Santulan v. Executive Secretary (Previous decision in Administrative Law)
- G.R. No. L-31490 Republic v. Bisaya Land Transportation Co. (Next decision in Administrative Law)
Full text
SECOND DIVISION
[ A.M. No. P-1487. December 20, 1977 ]
MARIA H. PEROL, COMPLAINANT, VS. ARSENIO
LUPISAN, JR., RESPONDENT.
R E S O L U T I O N
AQUINO, J.:
Maria H. Perol, a cashier in the D
& G restaurant at
Lupisan denied the charge. He explained that his relations with Maria were platonic and that she had made him the scapegoat for her predicament after she learned that he is the sole heir of his widowed mother.
At the hearing on
In view of that motion to dismiss, the counsel for Maria H. Perol manifested that she was withdrawing her complaint.
The Investigator in his report recommended that the case be considered closed.
Under the circumstances, there is no justification for further proceeding against respondent Lupisan.
WHEREFORE, the complaint is dismissed and this case is considered closed.
SO ORDERED.Barredo, (Acting Chairman), Antonio, Concepcion, Jr., and Guerrero*, JJ., concur.
Fernando and
* J. Guerrero was designated to sit in the Second Division.