Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Hashim Commercial & Trading Co. v. Piaoco

G.R. No. 1114 · Promulgated April 24, 1922 · Ponente: Malcolm

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of judgment in an appeal deemed frivolous, with costs imposed on the appellant.

Frivolous Appeal, Judgment Affirmed, Costs

Related cases

G.R. No. 18624 Marquez v. Revilla (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G.R. No. 1797 Fabillo v. Tionko (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila

EN BANC

G.R. No. 1114 April 24, 1922

THE HASHIM COMMERCIAL & TRADING CO., plaintiff-appelle,
vs. SERAFIN UY PIAOCO, defendant-appellant.

The appellant in his own behalf. Crossfiled & O'brien for appellee.

MALCOLM, J.:

A frivolous appeal. Judgement affirmed. Trebele costs imposed upon appellant. So ordered.

Araullo, C.J., Villamor, Ostrand, Johns and Romualdez, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.