Supreme Court decision · Civil Law
Romonafe Corporation v. National Power Corporation
G.R. No. 168122 · Promulgated October 4, 2007 · Ponente: Carpio Morales
In brief
This case is about the denial of a motion for reconsideration and clarification of the specific area of property subject to a 1995 tax assessment.
Motion for Reconsideration, Property Area, Civil Case, Assessment, Clarification
Related cases
- G.R. No. 130864 Harold v. Aliba (Previous decision in Civil Law)
- G.R. NO. 152572 Borbe v. Calalo (Next decision in Civil Law)
Full text
SECOND DIVISION
[ G.R. NO. 168122, October 04, 2007 ]
ROMONAFE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.
RESOLUTION
CARPIO MORALES, J.:
Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration of Resolution dated April 16, 2007 with Motion for Leave to File Instant Motion,[1] which this Court treats as a 2nd Motion for Reconsideration, is Denied. It is a prohibited pleading.
On the clarification[2] being sought by petitioner regarding the actual area of its property subject of Civil Case No. 1140-95 to which the 1995 assessment applies, this Court clarifies that, indeed, the area is 48,103.12 square meters. The pertinent portion[3] of the Decision of January 30, 2007 is thus amended to read:
Quisumbing, (Chairperson), Carpio, Tinga, and Velasco, Jr., JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp. 361-373.
[2] Id. at 372.
[3] Decision, p. 9; id. at 351.
On the clarification[2] being sought by petitioner regarding the actual area of its property subject of Civil Case No. 1140-95 to which the 1995 assessment applies, this Court clarifies that, indeed, the area is 48,103.12 square meters. The pertinent portion[3] of the Decision of January 30, 2007 is thus amended to read:
It bears clarification, however, that the 1995 assessment applies only to the 48,103.12 square meters of Romonafe’s property subject of Civil Case No. 1140-95.SO ORDERED.
Quisumbing, (Chairperson), Carpio, Tinga, and Velasco, Jr., JJ., concur.
[1] Rollo, pp. 361-373.
[2] Id. at 372.
[3] Decision, p. 9; id. at 351.