Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Cabrera v. Bello
G. R. No. 35898 · Promulgated May 4, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of a lower court judgment with costs ordered against the appellant.
Judgment Affirmed, Costs, Court of First Instance, Batangas
Related cases
- G. R. No. 39180 Talens v. Sevilla (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. NO. 36279 & 36333 Uganiza v. Urganiza (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. NO. 35898, May 04, 1934 ]
TOMAS CABRERA, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, BRIGIDA BELLO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _____________the appellee__________ recover from the __________the appellant__________the sum of _________P40.00_________, as costs.