Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Samante v. Padilla

G. R. NO. 36263 · Promulgated May 4, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation with costs of a lower court order in an appeal dispute between Samante and Padilla.

Affirmation, Costs, Court of First Instance, Occidental Misamis

Related cases

G. R. No. 39186 Panganiban v. Luneta Motor Co. (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G.R. No. 40378 Casanovas v. Start (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. NO. 36263, May 04, 1934 ]

MAMERTO SAMANTE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. APOLINAR PADILLA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Occidental Misamis ________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________June ____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________recover from the _____________the appellant_________the sum of ________P40.00_________, as costs.