Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Buencamino v. Payumo
G. R. No. 37932 · Promulgated May 24, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of the Court of First Instance's order on appeal, with costs imposed on the appellant.
Court of First Instance, Affirmation, Costs, Judgment, Appeal
Related cases
- G. R. No. 37933 Payumo v. Buencamino (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 36324 Gaviola v. Ragas (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 37932, May 24, 1934 ]
FELIPE BUENCAMINO, JR., APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. INOCENCIO PAYUMO, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________8th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija ________, dated the __________26th__________ day of _________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________appellees__________ recover from __________appellants__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.