Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Sison v. Cruz

G.R. No. 38730 · Promulgated May 14, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of the Court of First Instance's order with costs against the appellants.

Court of First Instance, Costs, Affirmation

Related cases

Full text

[ G. R. No. 38730, May 14, 1934 ]

CANDELARIA SISON ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ULAM CRUZ ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________11th__________ day of _________August____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost in this instance against the appellants.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.