Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Talavera v. Capumfuerza
G. R. No. 39438 · Promulgated May 3, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of a trial court's decision with costs against the appellants.
Costs, Judgment, Appeal, Trial Court, Affirmation
Related cases
- G. R. No. 39835 Florentino v. Encarnacion (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 39180 Talens v. Sevilla (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 39438, May 03, 1934 ]
RUSTICO TALAVERA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. ENRICO CAPUMFUERZA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tarlac________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-wo____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.