Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Artaijo v. Chulilian

G. R. No. 39678 · Promulgated May 19, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a lower court's decision with costs awarded to the appellees against the appellant.

Appeal, Cost, Court of First Instance, Negros Occidental, Judgment

Related cases

G. R. No. 41093 Ongliengco v. Pacheco y Jose (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 38018 Sabado v. Beltran (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 39678, May 19, 1934 ]

ASUNCION ARTAJO, IN BEHALF AND AS GUIRDIAN OF HER MINOR SON, SERGIO LEE PING, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS.CHULIIAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________3rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Occidental________, dated the __________13th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with cost against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.