Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Recto v. Macauan

G. R. No. 40161 · Promulgated May 8, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a Court of First Instance decision ordering the defendant-appellant to pay costs to the plaintiff-appellee.

Judgment, Costs, Affirmation, Rizal

Related cases

G.R. No. 36408 Torres v. Santos (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 41119 Sison v. Director of Prisons (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 40161, May 08, 1934 ]

CLARO M. RECTO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. DOROTEO T. MACAUAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________May____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs in the instance against the defendant-appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.