Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Omilla v. Ongayo
G. R. No. 40377 · Promulgated May 14, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of the order of the Court of First Instance of Misamis Oriental dated March 24, 1933, upon appeal.
Judgment Affirmation, Costs, First Instance Court, Misamis Oriental
Related cases
- G. R. No. 37520 Magistrado v. Iriola (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 39035 Geguillana v. Gemoto (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 40377, May 14, 1934 ]
MARGARITO OMILLA ET AL., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANTS VS. LUIS ONGAYO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Misamis Oriental________, dated the __________24th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from __________xx__________xx__________ the sum of P__xx__ , as costs.