Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
De La Fuente v. Municipal Road of Manila
G. R. No. 41640 · Promulgated May 10, 1934
In brief
This case is about the issuance of a writ of mandamus against the Municipal Road of Manila following the setting aside of a court order.
Writ of Mandamus, Appeal, Court Order
Related cases
- G.R. No. 37533 Cabellon v. Reyes (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 39526 Evangelista v. Medina (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 41640, May 10, 1934 ]
MANUEL DE LA FUENTE, PETITIONER, VS. MUNICIPAL ROAD OF MANILA, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila ________, dated the __________18th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , set aside and the record immediately to said court of origin for the the issuance of a writ of mandamus as prayed for, without special pronouncement as to costs in either instances.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of Pxx__________xx, as costs.