Supreme Court decision · Election Law
Tañada v. Municipal Council of Gumaca
G. R. No. 41766 · Promulgated May 21, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of a lower court's order involving a dispute with the Municipal Council of Gumaca and the awarding of costs.
Appeal, Judgment Affirmation, Costs, Municipal Council
Related cases
- G. R. No. 41760 Albarracin v. Municipal Council of Argao (Previous decision in Election Law)
- G.R. No. 41720 Bulado v. Mercado (Next decision in Election Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 41766, May 21, 1934 ]
JUAN R. TAÑADA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF GUMACA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, MOISES C. CAPARROS, ET AL., INTERVENOR-APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________19th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of both instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that _________the appellee_________ recover from __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.