Supreme Court decision · Civil Law

Casocot v. Vamenta

G.R. No. L-55954 · Promulgated December 19, 1981 · Ponente: Makasiar

In brief

This case is about a petition for damages arising from alleged malicious and unlawful acts causing mental anguish and humiliation, leading the court to set aside prior orders and direct trial to proceed.

New Civil Code, Mental Anguish, Exemplary Damages, Trial Court Jurisdiction, Administrative Remedies

Related cases

G.R. No. L-27810 Republic of the Philippines v. Consolidated Terminals, Inc. (Previous decision in Civil Law)
G.R. No. L-55273-83 Rayo v. Court of First Instance of Bulacan (Next decision in Civil Law)

Full text

FIRST DIVISION

G.R. No. L-55954 December 19, 1981

FERMIN CASOCOT and CEFERINA CASOCOT, for themselves and in behalf of DENNIS CARMELO CASOCOT, petitioners
vs. THE HONORABLE CIPRIANO V. VAMENTA, JR., District Judge, Court of First Instance, Branch III, of Negros Oriental; and ELADIO DIOKO, VIRGINIA CAPULSO, PERLA DULALAS, CELIA FE GAMO, AMBROCIO PINERO, NAPOLEON CAPULSO, ESTER GARGANTIEL, SOCORRO ARROYO, FELINA VIAJEDOR, AVELINA ELNAR, ALFREDO VIAJEDOR, MAGDALENA ESTINOSO RUFINO AGUINOD, and ONOFRE CORPUZ, Minister of Education and Culture, respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

MAKASIAR, J:

Without prejudice to an extended opinion, it appearing that the complaint is based on Article 27 of the New Civil Code; that petitioners's complaint obviously prays for damages in an amount exceeding P10,000.00 and therefore within the jurisdiction of respondent trial court because paragraph 7 of petitioners' complaint alleges that the "tortured feelings, mental anguish, public contempt and humiliation" suffered by petitioners "by virtue of the aforesaid malicious, unlawful and deliberate acts of respondents which can be compensated in the amount of not less than P5,000.00 for each of the petitioners, ..." who "have incurred expenses incidental to this action in the amount to be proved during the trial of this case, and petitioners are entitled to exemplary damages under the circumstances ..."; and that petitioners had exhausted administrative remedies when they appealed to respondent Division Superintendent Eladio Dioko who, after consultation with the Regional Director of MEC Region 7, wired the District Supervisor of Bayawan East Central School that as per MEC Order 17, s.1978, petitioner Dennis Carmelo Casocot is entitled to and will be designated "first honors" (p. 12, rec., Annex 1), the COURT RESOLVED TO SET ASIDE the orders of respondent Judge dated July 23, 1980, as well as the orders dated September 1, 1980; and the respondent Judge is hereby directed to proceed with the trial of the case as against the respondents, except the Ministry of Education and Culture and Division Superintendent Eladio Diokno, in whose favor the petition was denied for lack of merit in our resolution of September 23, 1981.ℒαwρhi৷ No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Fernandez, Guerrero and Melencio-Herrera, JJ., concur.