Supreme Court decision · Civil Law
Bigornia de Cardenas v. Cardenas
G.R. No. L-8218 · Promulgated December 15, 1955 · Ponente: Padilla
In brief
This case is about annulling the marriage between Leoncio Cardenas and Florencia Rinen due to the subsistence of a prior valid marriage between Leoncio Cardenas and Eulogia Bigornia.
Marriage, Bigamy, Presumption of Validity, Stipulation of Facts, Authority To Solemnize
Related cases
- G.R. No. L-8327 Cuevas v. Cuevas (Previous decision in Civil Law)
- G.R. Nos. L-8562-8563 Mendoza v. Cayas (Next decision in Civil Law)
Full text
| |||
| (Sgd.) MARCELINO N. SAYO Counsel for plaintiff Suite 302 Calvo Building Escolta, Manila | (Sgd.) SIXTO BRILLANTES Attorney for the Defendants R-202 Digna Bldg., Manila | ||
Exhibit "A"
MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE
Municipality of Malate, Province of Manila, July 10, 1927.
| Husband | Wife | |
| Name | Leoncio Cardenas | Eulogia Bigornia |
| Age | 32 | 24 |
| Father | Quiterio Cardenas | Dominga Bigornia |
| Mother | Remigia Belo | Maria Tamayo |
| Consent of Residence | Fort McKinley | Bangued, Abra |
| Birthplace | Santa, Ilocos Sur | Bangued, Abra |
| Nationality | Filipino | Filipina |
| Occupation | Scout | Embroidery |
| Number of former marriages | One | None |
| Was former marriage dissolved by death or divorce, or annulled? | Death | None |
| Blood relationship, if any, existing between contracting parties | None | None |
I hereby certify that I ascertained, previous to the solemnization of the marriage, the truth of the foregoing statements from the sworn testimony of the parties, and of the witnesses Esteban Ripan and Inocencia Rosario. I do further certify that Leoncio Cardenas and Eulogia Bigornia above named, at my home, 11 Calle Wright, in Malate, Province of Manila, were with their mutual consent lawfully joined together in matrimony by me in the presence of Esteban Ripan of 16 H. Basco, and Inocencia Rosario of 16 H. Basco, attesting witnesses. And do further certify that the parties to this marriage are personally known to me and were satisfactorily identified by the oath of the witnesses, and that upon due inquiry by me made, there appeared to be no lawful impediment to the marriage.
Witness my hand this 10th day of July, 1927.
Contracting Parties:
(Sgd.) LEONCIO CARDENAS
(Sgd.) EULOGIA BIGORNIA(Sgd.)
GEORGE W. WRIGHT
Minister
Witnesses:
(Sgd.) ESTEBAN RIPAN
(Sgd.) INOCENCIA ROSARI
Exhibit "B"
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to certify that in the Register of Marriage, Series of 1948, under the custody of the Municipal Treasurer, Badoc, Ilocos Norte, there appears an entry of marriage, to wit:
| Register No | 42 |
| Name of Husband | Leoncio Cardenas |
| Age | 53 |
| Birthplace | Santa, Ilocos Sur |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Occupation | Phil. Scout |
| No. of former marriage | None |
| Blood relationship | None |
| Name of father | Quiterio Cardenas |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Name of mother | Remigia Belo |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Name of wife | Florencia Rinen |
| Age | 29 |
| Birthplace | Barrio 1, Badoc, Ilocos Norte |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Occupation | Mun. Teacher |
| No. of former marriage | None |
| Blood relationship | None |
| Name of father | Laureano Olaycay |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Name of mother | Juliana Rinen |
| Nationality | Filipino |
| Date of marriage | April 19, 1948 |
| Place of marriage | Justice of the Peace |
| Solemnized by | Atty. Vicente R. Campos |
| Title | Judge |
| Remarks: Witnesses | Romualdo Calaylay Feliza L. Tolentino |
The above is a true and correct copy from its original and in witness whereof, I hereby sign my name at Badoc, Ilocos Norte, this 27th day of July, 1951.
(Sgd.) F. M. TOLENTINO
Municipal Treasurer
Upon this stipulation the Court rendered judgment declaring that the marriage between the defendants Leoncio Cardenas and Florencia Rinen entered into on 19 April 1948 is null and void ab initio. Costs were taxed against them. From this judgment the defendants appeal.
The appellants insist on their contention that there is nothing in the stipulation which shows that Minister George W. Wright had authority to solemnize the marriage between Leoncio Cardenas and Eulogia Bigornia; that it does not appear in the stipulation of facts that a marriage license was issued to enable them to marry.lawphi1.net
A marriage license as provided for in article 53, paragraph 4, of the new Civil Code and in section 7 of the Marriage Law (Act No. 3613), which took effect on 30 August 1950 and 4 December 1929, respectively, was not required by General Orders No. 68, the law in force on 10 July 1927 when the marriage was entered into by and between Cardenas and Bigornia. The marriage certificate attesting that a marriage ceremony was performed by a minister named George W. Wright gives rise to the presumption that all legal formalities required by law had been complied with the fulfilled. If the minister was not authorized to perform such marriage ceremony it was incumbent upon the defendants to show such lack of authority on the part of the minister.
In disposing of this appeal we did not overlook article 88 of the new Civil Code which provides that "No judgment annulling a marriage shall be promulgated upon a stipulation of facts . . .." This article and article 101 on legal separation of the same Code contemplate the annulment of a marriage or legal separation where the parties might secure the annulment of their marriage or their legal separation by collusion. In this case the possibility of such collusion is remote, because the interest of the two wives are conflicting. Apart from this, the marriage certifiates attached to the stipulation of facts are evidence and cannot be deemed to be a stipulation of facts..
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs against the appellants..
Paras, C. J., Bengzon, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Jugo, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, and Reyes, J. B. L., JJ., concur..