Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Velasquez v. De Torres

G. R. No. 35424 · Promulgated May 7, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of the Court of First Instance's judgment with costs against the appellant.

Judgment Affirmed, Costs, Court of First Instance, Batangas

Related cases

G. R. No. 36407 Dol-Loog v. Tagatac (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G.R. No. 36408 Torres v. Santos (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 35424, May 07, 1934 ]

LUCIO VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT CONTRA C1PRIAN0 DE TORRES ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that _________the appellees___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.