Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Dol-Loog v. Tagatac
G. R. No. 36407 · Promulgated May 7, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation with costs of a Court of First Instance decision and the appellant being ordered to pay costs to the appellee.
Costs, Court of First Instance, Judgment Affirmed
Related cases
- G. R. No. 36400 Aducayen et al. v. Balanay et al. (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 35424 Velasquez v. De Torres (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 36407, May 07, 1934 ]
MAXIMO DOL-LOOG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. LAORPO TAGATAC, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Norte ________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.