Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Tichangco v. Victoria

G. R. No. 36382 · Promulgated May 5, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation with costs of a Court of First Instance decision involving parties Tichangco and Victoria.

Court of First Instance, Nueva Ecija, Costs, Affirmation

Related cases

G. R. No. 37512 Arroyo v. Dimabogti (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 39038 Sebastian v. Baguisi (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 36382, May 05, 1934 ]

APOLINARIO TICHANGCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. VICENTA VICTORIA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija________, dated the __________2nd__________ day of __________July____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ____________the appellee____________ recover from the ____________the appellants_____________the sum P__40.00________, as costs.