Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Arroyo v. Dimabogti

G. R. No. 37512 · Promulgated May 5, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a trial court's order on appeal with costs imposed on the appellant.

Judgment, Costs, Appeal, Affirmation, Court of First Instance

Related cases

G. R. No. 40112 Zarape v. Perez (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 36382 Tichangco v. Victoria (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 37512, May 05, 1934 ]

JULIAN ARROYO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. FELIPE DIMABOGTI ET AL., DEFENDANTS, FELIPE DIMABOGTI, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT, VICTORINO ARROYO, ET AL., INTERVENORS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from _________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00___, as costs.