Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Zarape v. Perez

G. R. No. 40112 · Promulgated May 5, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a lower court's decision with costs against the plaintiff-appellant.

Costs, Appeal, Judgment Affirmed, Court of First Instance, Batangas

Related cases

G. R. No. 37492 Reyes v. Vargas (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 37512 Arroyo v. Dimabogti (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 40112, May 05, 1934 ]

DAMASO ZARAPE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. EVARISTO PEREZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Batangas________, dated the __________15th__________ day of __________May____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs in this instance against the plaintiff-appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the defendant-appellee__________ recover from __________the plaintiff-appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.