Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
De Stilianopulos v. De Ramos
G. R. No. 37695 · Promulgated May 16, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of a lower court's order regarding an appeal and the awarding of costs to the appellee.
Court Decision, Appeal, Affirmance, Costs
Related cases
- G. R. No. 39560 Atienza v. Bautista (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 41093 Ongliengco v. Pacheco y Jose (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 37695, May 16, 1934 ]
ESTELA DE STILIANOPULOS, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. ESTELA DE RAMOS ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND DEFENDANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirned with cost against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.