Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law
Atienza v. Bautista
G. R. No. 39560 · Promulgated May 16, 1934
In brief
This case is about the affirmation of a Court of First Instance order from Laguna dated January 6, 1933.
Related cases
- G. R. No. 39436 Arsons Hardware Company, Inc. v. Reyes (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
- G. R. No. 37695 De Stilianopulos v. De Ramos (Next decision in Remedial Law)
Full text
[ G. R. No. 39560, May 16, 1934 ]
GREGORIO ATIENZA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ENRIQUE BAUTISTA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________6th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that __xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from __xx__________xx__________xx the sum of P__xx__ ,as costs.