Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Victorino v. Matawaran

G. R. No. 39454 · Promulgated May 15, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a Court of First Instance decision and the imposition of costs on the appellant.

Court of First Instance, Appeal, Costs, Judgment Affirmed

Related cases

G. R. No. 39457 Sapuriada v. Fallorin (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 39565 Yanco v. Sy Chiap (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 39454, May 15, 1934 ]

EMILIA VICTORINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LUCIO MATAWARAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-wo____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__80.00__, as costs.