Supreme Court decision · Remedial Law

Sapuriada v. Fallorin

G. R. No. 39457 · Promulgated May 15, 1934

In brief

This case is about the affirmation of a Court of First Instance judgment with costs assessed against the appellant.

Appeal, Costs, Judgment Affirmed, Court of First Instance, Zambales

Related cases

G. R. NO. 35938 Perez et al. v. Perez Paz (Previous decision in Remedial Law)
G. R. No. 39454 Victorino v. Matawaran (Next decision in Remedial Law)

Full text

[ G. R. No. 39457, May 15, 1934 ]

DOMINGO T. SAPURIADA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. CIPRIANO FALLORIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Zambales________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance assessed against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ___________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.